"In Meads's world, the lovely and the
malevolent are intertwined, but Meads presents no determining
clues, no visual "talking points" that allow the viewer to gain
access to the images' second, third, or 50th readings. Such
intent opacity gives the imagery a pulling, nagging weight that
you can feel, a low level of anxiety, but that you cannot
identify, or, rather, verify, without the back-up information."
R.M. Vaughan, The Globe and Mail |
|